Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who is the Better Bowler in All Formats Currently?
Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning spell in the second T20I against India, raising the question of whether he currently outperforms Jasprit Bumrah. During the game at the MCG, Hazlewood was almost unplayable, taking advantage of the new ball to devastate the Indian top-order. He claimed three key wickets—Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma—conceding only 13 runs in four overs. This crucial performance restricted India to a total of just 125 runs.
India looked to their star pacer, Jasprit Bumrah, to replicate Hazlewood’s impact and help chase down the target. However, Bumrah struggled early, leaking runs and making the pursuit easier for Australia. He ended his spell with two wickets for 26 runs, but those dismissals had limited impact on the game.
“Hazlewood’s spell with the new ball literally ripped through the Indian top-order and gave them a shock, from which they failed to recover.”
Although Bumrah is widely regarded as one of the best pacers in modern cricket, this recent performance comparison sparks debate about Hazlewood’s form and effectiveness across all formats.
Career Overview Across Formats
When comparing their overall careers, Jasprit Bumrah stands out as the more effective bowler. He maintains a superior average and strike rate across formats, suggesting greater consistency and impact over time.
“Jasprit Bumrah emerges as the more efficient of the two with better average and strike rate across formats.”
Summary
Josh Hazlewood’s recent brilliance in T20Is challenges Jasprit Bumrah’s dominance, but Bumrah’s career stats affirm his edge as the more consistent all-format bowler.
Author’s note: Recent form highlights Hazlewood’s rise, yet Bumrah’s overall career efficiency still places him ahead as the better bowler across all formats.