The 50th Anniversary of Sir John Kerr’s Dismissal
Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of the day governor-general Sir John Kerr legitimately exercised a constitutional power to resolve a deadlock and secure Crown funds necessary for government operations. Despite acting within his constitutional authority, Sir John Kerr has faced relentless criticism throughout his life and posthumously.
Clarifying Sir John Kerr's Role
It is important to understand that Sir John Kerr did not remove a government due to its incompetence; the Australian people did. Kerr provided the means for this change, but that was a consequence of his decision, not its primary intent.
Anticipated Renewed Criticism
The anniversary is expected to bring a fresh wave of attacks on Sir John Kerr through multiple channels:
- A new biography of former Prime Minister Whitlam
- A Sky News Australia documentary
- A day-long event organized by the Museum of Australian Democracy, live-streamed from Old Parliament House and chaired by Barrie Cassidy
Partisan Voices at the Event
The event will feature several prominent participants, including journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston, as well as academic Professor Jenny Hocking, all known for their opposition to Kerr. Most contributors align with the Labor party, forecasting a politically charged atmosphere on this significant day.
"Sir John Kerr did not deliver us from a grossly incompetent government. The people of Australia did that. Sir John Kerr simply gave them the opportunity to do so."
Such discussions underscore the enduring controversy surrounding Kerr's decision and its impact on Australian politics.
Author's summary: The 50th anniversary of Sir John Kerr’s dismissal stirs renewed partisan criticism, despite his constitutional duty to resolve Australia's political crisis.