New behaviour standards have been introduced in the Australian Parliament to improve workplace culture and reduce harassment among politicians and staff.
However, crossbench members argue that the reforms have not gone far enough. They claim that "question time" — a period meant for political accountability — remains dominated by aggressive language, personal attacks, and behaviour that many describe as bullying.
Independent MP Zali Steggall has voiced her concerns about the persistence of hostile conduct despite formal policy updates.
She stated:
"Bullying and intimidation are still very much part of parliamentary culture, especially during question time."
Steggall and other independents advocate for stronger enforcement of behavioural standards and clearer accountability mechanisms.
Many MPs and advocates believe that real cultural reform requires more than policy adjustments.
They argue that genuine respect and civility must be embedded in daily interactions, not only codified in official guidelines.
Some representatives are urging the Speaker and parliamentary committees to take stronger action against repeat offenders and set a consistent example of professional conduct.
Observers note that the tone of debate in Parliament can shape public discourse. If political leaders tolerate bullying or hostile exchanges, it sends a message to the wider community about acceptable behaviour in workplaces and schools.
Efforts to improve political culture are therefore viewed as part of a broader national movement against bullying and toxic environments.
"Parliament should set the standard, not fall short of it," one commentator remarked.
Author summary: Despite updated conduct rules, Australian Parliament’s question time still fuels bullying, highlighting the gap between policy change and cultural transformation.